Sustainability... ha... ha... haaa...

Few days ago, we had a group discussion based on the reading material we were given during our History and Theory in Design tutorial session. Some how.... I felt like, WE , the future potential architects should present our assignments in another way. A way where no lies should be told.

Of course, we have to sell our designs and ideas with all the positive characteristics.
But, I think we should add in another session after all the positives are finish presented.
A session where we tell the clients, the tutors, the lecturers or who ever it can be, about the shit in our designs.

Then, why are we calling our design SUSTAINABLE? or 'more sustainable'?
From the view point of a pessimist, I personally think that we should name it 'less destructive'.

"Not that we are trying to deny the truth, but we are trying to look more positive."

"PO---po-poo--poo-po-po-po positive?  Porrrre-LARN la!hahaha...." XP

haha.... I know it's kind of harsh to put it this way. 

But it's good to know that we are actually nothing at all.

扮清高的同时，

其实我们都很自私。

This is what you get when we know too much.

Destruction and Sustainability ....

just a line between them?